Economics 26/03/2010: National output figures

Held back by work, I am only now catching up with data released this week by CSO, so do stay tuned - these pages will be featuring more analysis in days to come.

First, QNA for Q4 2009 came in, putting annual decline in GDP at 7.1% for 2009 and GNP at a whooping 11.3% (per table below):
This is slightly better than my predicted annual declines of GDP to the tune of 7.3% and GNP to 11.5-11.7%. Nonetheless, as CSO admits, these figures mark historical record of declines.

Throughout the year, I have traced the paths for the main QNA series in charts. A picture, after all, is worth a thousand words. So here they are, updated for the latest figures:

The first chart above shows GDP and GNP time series. Two things are apparent from these figures: first, all three series peaked at the same time - in 2007. This is significant for as we shall see below, the same does not hold for growth rates. Second, notice how factor cost-based GDP is showing more mild downward trend than market prices-based GDP measure? This suggests that deflation (market prices change) has been so far much more significant than declines in factor costs. This does not really bode well for our hopes of improving our competitiveness through this cycle.

Next chart shows components of GDP and GNP:
Notice how two state-supported sectors - public sector and agriculture (the latter supported, of course, via CAP) show no signs of a recession? Both are having jolly good time - courtesy of taxpayers (Irish and European). Also, do keep in mind that some of the public sector activities fall into other categories - e.g. transport was probably supported by the semi-state companies and their ability to ignore recession when it comes to hiking prices and charges (DAA is one good example here). So in real terms, private sector activity in each one of these sub-sectors is down by more than the CSO aggregates suggest.

Next chart illustrates another historic record:
The gap between our MNCs-dominated exporting economy and our domestic economy is now at historic highs - reaching 23% in 2009. This means that almost a quarter of what Ireland claims to produce (GDP) is really an accountancy trick and has nothing to do with this country. Of course, for years we have been conditioned to think that we are filthy rich because our GDP is so high. Oh, how deep the fallacy runs.

Now, think about the core metrics of state solvency deployed in international markets. Take our national debt. At current €77.6bn (per NTMA) it officially stands at just 45.6% of our GDP (46.2% if we are to use more time-consistent estimate from Finance Dublin). In the real world, this figure should reflect our real national income, for we can't seriously expect the foreign MNCs to be responsible for Ireland's debt. So the real figure should be 55.5% of GNP. Almost a 10 percentage points spread.

Now, let's take our current position and take a peek into the future. Suppose we take last 6 years' average growth rates for respective series. How long will it take for our various measures of income (bogus GDP and more honest GNP) to bring us back to the prosperity of 2007?
As chart above illustrates, should our MNCs continue racing ahead as they did up until now, happy days will come back to our shores again in 2018. Of course, relying on our domestic (real) economy to chug along as it did in 2003-2009 period means we will be back to 2007 levels of income some time around 2026. Mister Cowen can keep telling us that things have bottomed out and that all will be well once growth returns. Numbers are a bit more honest here.

What else did the QNA release give us that CSO omitted in its release?

Let's take a look at quarterly frequency:
Notice how both GDP and GNP are running close to (but below) 4-quarter moving averages? This is the third time it is happening in the current crisis and every time it is followed by a renewed pull away from the MA line downward. GNP is seemingly poised to cross over in Q1 2010, posting a possible quarterly gain. Of course, this is just a momentum force, which has to be backed by fundamentals. And the fundamentals are still pretty nasty. But there isn't a hope of even a technical rebound indicated in the GDP line. So:

• Will we see a GDP/GNP gap contracting somewhat in Q1 2010 with GDP starting to show much more weakness than GNP?
• Will GNP loose technical momentum building up and renew its downward slide?

Only time will tell, but, here is an interesting snapshot. Remember the latest QNHS? Q4 2009 marked the return of Construction sector to the leading role in driving unemployment higher. This is collaborated by the following figure:
Activity in construction and building sector shows absolutely no willingness to move above the moving average line. If anything, it is still contracting at a massively rapid rate.

Lastly, let me show you an interesting chart on annual rates of change in the GDP/GNP series:
Notice that in contrast with levels in overall activity (the first chart above), growth rates actually peaked in two different years, with 2007 decline in the growth rate of GNP clearly providing a warning signal for the Government that things might be getting slightly unsteady. Coupled with what was going on at the time in the financial markets (remember, the crisis in financial markets started actually in July 2007), that was a warning shot. I recall interpreting it this way in a couple of my columns - back in Business & Finance and in the Sunday Tribune.

I will cover trade figures contained in QNA release in the later post dealing with overall trade issues, so do stay tuned.

Economics 01/07/2009: UK Ad Spend, QNA & US Consumer Confidence

Per Adweek, advertising spend in the UK fell 4% to £18.6bn in 2008. All media experienced declines, apart from internet and cinema fell, according to figures released on 29 June by the Advertising Association. The drop compares with a rise of 4.3% in 2007. Press (newspapers and magazines) was the biggest spending category at £6.8bn in 2008, down 11.8% yoy. TV was the second-biggest spending category (£4.4bn), down 4.9%. Internet spend was third at £3.6bn up 19.1% on 2007. Radio was down 8.5% to £488m, outdoor and transport fell 3.8% to £1bn, while cinema rose 1% to £205m. Three things are worth noting in these figures:

• As consumer confidence and spending collapsed, overall advertising spend stayed surprisingly firm;
• Internet has probably benefited from substitution from costlier print and TV/radio to cheaper on-line advertising. This is potentially a 'recession factor' (in a recession, such substitution is usually a temporary phenomena - once growth returns, the old spending/consumption patterns return rather swiftly), so internet advertising will need to look at adopting some new proposition for selling once the growth cycle restarts;
• The figures do not specify what share of spending contraction can be attributed to lower costs of advertising, in other words, we do not know whether the fall was due to declining client activity or due to improved cost of advertising.
  

More on yesterday's Quarterly National Accounts data. Here is the snapshot of the widening GDP/GNP gap in Ireland - a clear sign of rising weaknesses in domestic sectors:
Note the trend peak in Q1 2005 and the absolute peak in Q4 2006. The first one corresponds to the end of post 2001-2002 correction and the latter to the SSIAs craze sweeping the nation.

Next, to the sectoral contributions to GDP.Our earnings from abroad are negatives and rising in absolute value - those Bulgarian and Romanian properties we've snapped up. Agriculture is overall the least important sector when it comes to GDP contributions. It used to account for 2.54% in Q1 2003, it accounts for 2.51% today (an increase from 2.33% a year ago). I wonder if that yoy increase captures the pumping of dioxins subsidies to pork producers. That was something, as the gravy trains go: Irish pork industry is worth €385mln pa, but in December last, the Government doled out €180mln to the industry in compensation for a one week stoppage (worth just €7.0mln in economic losses).

Then come Public Administration (up slightly from 3% an year ago to 3.25% this Q1, with another pesky side to it in the form of continued inflation in the sector).

Building and construction fell from a high of Q1 output of 8.93% of GDP back in 2006 to 5.99% in Q1 2009.

For what it's worth as an intellectual exercise, were we to invest all overseas property money back in the country, while shutting down:

• Option 1: Agriculture, Building & Construction, and Public Administration all together, we would be still 6% of GDP better off;
• Option 2: Agriculture, Public Administration and all Taxation, we would be 1.9% of GDP better off.

Of course - this is just an accountancy exercise, not a real economic policy, but it does put into perspective the fact that we have a sector accounting for just 2.5% of the economy and yet commanding its own Department with thousands of bureaucrats in employment...


Expecting the expected: US Consumer Confidence has taken a fall, once again, proving that the previous 'rebounds' were just a temporary mathematical correction before new jobs losses and continued weakness in the economy feed through to consumer sentiment. US consumer confidence fell to 49.3 in June from a downwardly revised 54.8 in May, the Conference Board reported Tuesday. Following a large confidence jump in May, consumers grew more pessimistic in June about their present and future. The present situation index declined to 24.8 in June from 29.7 in May, while the expectations index fell to 65.5 from 71.5. Note that the change in expectations was largely in-line with current conditions move, signaling that the US consumers are not exactly treating the current deterioration as temporary decline on significant May improvement.

A lesson for Obama? Don't give tax breaks to the elderly and the poor - give them to the middle classes. Last month improvement in personal income in the US was almost entirely due to Federal tax rebates to the elderly and the poor. This might be fine in the economy that is running at around trend growth, where consumption of non-durables is a problem, but it is not as efficient as a middle class tax break in the economy where precautionary savings are a problem.

A lesson for Ireland? Given that our own economic conditions are much worse than those in the US, and given that the government tax policies in Ireland are intirely internicine, I doubt we can expect significant gains in consumer confidence in months ahead. Instead, we should expect a new wave of layoffs to hit in Autumn 2009 and then again in January 2010.